Isnt the circumstantial evidence enough to make people think that 9/11 might have been an inside job?
perhaps those theories saying there were no planes are out there to distract. yes, planes were used, but given the events in the years before and certainly after 9/11 should raise eyebrows and make people question exactly how much involvement those with the REAL power in the USA had with the event ( and i dont just mean Bush).
1. defense contractors have had a windfall, corruption is rampant.
2. the patriot act was ready FAR too soon afterwards. it is far too detailed a document to be drafter in 6 weeks (look at all the previous laws it amended)
3. there was a push to centrilize ALL law enforcement prior to 9/11, with great opposition. but after, well, the Dept of Homeland security had NO opposition.
4. if security was really an issue, why was the invasion of the southern border ignored until people started to stop fearing arabs?
this isnt all that can be written, as there are hundreds of other things that make you go hmmm……
i wonder how many intellegent responses i will get…
Posted in Info | 
Tags: 9/11, been, circumstantial, defense contractors, dept of homeland security, enough, evidence, Inside, Isnt, might, opposition, people, Security, think, USA, Wayne Allyn, wayne allyn root
16 Responses to “Isnt the circumstantial evidence enough to make people think that 9/11 might have been an inside job?”
Leave a Reply
Nope. I hate Bush but i’ll never believe that he had anything to do with 9/11
Actually, that is really weak circumstantial evidence.
BTW, your question needs to be intelligent before you should expect intelligent answers.
I think the Keebler elves did it. And they plotted it with the help of the evil Rice Krispies guys. Snap hid the evidence by killing off Crackle and Pop. We can’t let this stand. We have to get the truth out. Snap needs to be found and tried. The Keebler elves will be sent to Guantanamo to be water-boarded.
Here in Texas circumstantial evidence got 5 innocent men over 150 years in prison lets ask them what they think about it
No there isn’t enough CREDIBLE circumstantial evidence to realistically think 9/11 was an inside job. I usually hear this argument from people that also think Bush is so stupid he can’t accomplish or do anything right. Then tell me how in the world he could have pulled off 9/11 with no one knowing about it, no reporters reporting it, no Democrats going after him for it and no credible evidence prooving the gov’t did it. Gov’t is far too incompetent to pull off something like this even if they wanted to and I don’t believe the Bush administration has any agenda except to try to better the US in every possible way they believe they can. I’m not suggesting you agree with how they do this just the fact that his heart is in the right place.
If the use of planes was a distraction, why go to such elaborate means? What if the planes missed? Would they call off 9/11? Why not just plant a bomb in the basement, take the towers out quick and then blame the terrorists. Remember, they tried this in 1993, so it wouldn’t be far fetched. If this was an inside job, they could have done it much better.
You do know the Earth is flat, and we never landed on the moon. Paul McCartney is dead and Elvis lives. Bush planned the 911 attacks. And here’s my favorite: David Icke has evidence that the world has been taken over by Lizard-men, disguised in human skin: http://www.davidicke.com/index.php/
How’s that for intellegent? About the same as yours I’d say.
In a normal society, this would have been recognized as a “job”, but the powers that be have conspired to make the word “conspiracy theorist” synonymous with” nutcase”. You’ll notice this as comments come in. They did a damn good job!
Unfortunately all the real evidence has been removed and can not be investigated. Quite convenient, and very interesting I might add.
At a crime scene evidence should be preserved not shipped out of the country, or melted down to make a Navy vessel.
Nope. If our government was that evil, trust me; they’d have left none of this “evidence” you point to. And you’d be dead for even suggesting it.
It was absolutely NOT an inside job. I have conclusive proof that aliens from a distant planet were solely responsible for 9/11. Unfortunately, they won’t let me release that information to you for fear that I will be transported to a barren moon.
Let the TRUTH BE TOLD! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tD5WlQ54Sg0
The real credible evidence is the number of lies that was uncovered that the Bush Administration has told.
People, don’t you think that if they lied about going to war with Iraq, they would lie about something like 9-11?
There is more than enough evidence that proves that there was SOME government involvement with 9-11. Though they might not have had a direct seat in planning it, they knew more than well that it was going to happen.
For months leading up to 9-11, Bush was getting loads of information DAILY that there was going to be an attack. He did nothing about it.
And then in the following days after 9-11, you had numerous members of the White House staff come forward and say, “nobody could have imagined 9-11 happening”.
Well, apparently people can. And they did, on more than one occasion. Look at the massacre at Columbine High School, It was found in one of the shooter’s personal journals that he wanted to fly an airplane into a building in New York City.
So, to everyone that thinks that government involvement in 9-11 is a conspiracy theory, look at the facts. The truth of the matter is that all “conspiracy theories” have multiple bits of truth in them.
I am afraid I do not even believe that to be circumstantial evidence. All of those may have simply been spring boarded or fast tracked due to 9/11. The inside job conspiracy theories are absurd.
And wow. The government was getting information that an attack was going to happen. Well hell then, why couldnt they figure out terrorists were going to fly planes into the Trade Towers? Are you kidding me? Thats a huge leap to take from point A to point B. Oh and of course we should have know becasue some crazy from Columbine had it in his journal? Oh yeah…. well since we all put so much credence into the ramblings of derranged teenagers who are so sad they have to shot others and themselves to get their rocks off. Yeah Bush should have seen it coming.
Maybe, just maybe….. had we had the proper type of intelligence gathering assests in place we might have been able to get a better handle of the level of threat. Keep in mind that it was Bill Clinton that removed the human factor in gathering intel on terrorists organizations so that we have to rely on computer systems. Yet, we blame Bush for not having predictive capabilities and pissed becasue he using technology to get information….. wow…. you just cant win with some people. There is planty of blame to go around, but too mant wanna hate Bush so much they cant see threw the trees.
Seriously?
The government can’t even keep the secret that it is monitoring phone calls to/from terror suspects outside of the United States and you expect them to keep a secret of this magnitude. Furthermore, if any of the evidence had any validity whatsoever, the mainstream media would be on it with a vengeance.
Hmmm, it’s time to turn off this computer.
I would beg to differ on the Dept. of Homeland Security not having any opposition.
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/11/18/homeland.security/index.html